On the Codes of Existence

Mem Fliigel ist zum Schwung bereil,ich kchrc gembutterflies and landscapes full of colors, the point of
zutuck,dcnn blieb ich auch Icbendlge Zcil,ich hiitteview which belongs to the observer (numbers...), that
wenig Gliick.of our private and mental investigation. A number is
(Gerhard Scholem Grass vom Angclus)always a symbol of something else which has been
We have always been imprisoned by illusions andthought, in our mind it is a fact, an action together
doubts, between a dream of flying and earthlywith his perceptions. We are in a world which is
wishes. These uncertainties and obstacles havegazed by something else, we are the past, illusion and
brought progress towards vague horizons, forgettinghope. A world where we canlive o¬n our
the real target that a reasonable mind has beenimpressions, taking them from an unidentified
searching for centuries: the possibility of flying tospectator, perhaps an angel flying with open wings,
stars, that moral firmament which wraps up ourtrying to decipher codes of existence, in the lapse of
existence. This infinire pursues Riabow who can't helpa moment fading away. Men and worlds, in Oleg's
using numbers, the myth of Icarus and colors whichpaintings seem to be without real outlooks. A point
remember medieval and ancient paintings.of view without relativism is instead an observation
I am not speaking about metaphors, but about areflecting o¬n what has been already perceived.
symbol that immediately comes out from his pictures.Our acts of knowledge are always situated o¬n
It seems to me an imagery without motion, aa superior level, that is what explains estrangement
kaleidoscopic difference between colors, like suddenfrom the two different levels of the real world, too;
insights from the roof of sky, a sort of coming back;the first is imagery, the world as it is seen by human
but perhaps is our unconscious that arranges picturesreason; the second are numbers and burning colors
in such a way.which o¬nly evoke reason and mind, being
There are, I think, two main leitmotivs in Oleg'simpressed and printed in bodies of representation
creation: estrangement that also means going away,itself (even Icarus' butterfly wings remind to a
and a point of view without relativism. The observerdefinite zymology).
(but do we really know who that is?) is situated in aWho is the observer now? Perhaps that Angelm
position that seems going away from representationNovus by Klee, taken by Walter Benjamin in his
shown in the picture: it is not our mind that imaginesessay about philosophy of history. If we accept this
a ship fishing in our everyday dish, not our eyewe can say that Oleg's creation is absolutely
seeing tumblers or others mythical figures; Oleg,metaphysical: the angel sight over a world made of
leaving out and suspending the natural connectionillusion and uncertainty.
between subject and object, gives to his fishes,