The Ecological and Political Impact of Colonialism in the Third World During the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries

Introductionto £1.3 million in value, falling to a mere £100,000
Colonialism is a system in which a state claimsby 1832. Through protectionism and the
sovereignty over territory and people outside its ownestablishment of the exploitative (British) East India
boundaries ; or a system of rule which assumes theTrading Company, Britain destroyed the Indian textile
right of one people to impose their will upon anothermarket and developed its own prosperous textile
(Brett, 1973). During the nineteenth and twentiethindustry (2).
centuries, rich, powerful states, including Britain andWhile India produced about 25% of world industrial
other European countries, owned third world colonies.output in 1750, this figure fell to only 2% by 1900.
‘Third world’ originally referred to countriesThis de-industrialisation, which can be defined as
that did not belong to the democratic, industrialisedmovement of labour out of manufacturing and into
countries of the West (the First World) or theagriculture, was accompanied by the creation of a
state-socialist, industrialising, Soviet Bloc countries (thepoorer, more rural society in India (Clingingsmith and
Second World) (Chilton, 2004). This essay usesWilliamson, 2004). In 1810, 40% of Indians lived in
specific third world examples to summarise the maintowns, by 1900 only 10 percent did (D’Amato,
impacts of nineteenth and twentieth century2003). Contrary to myths about colonialism being a
colonialism, when colonial powers reached their peak.time of ‘heroic progress through
It focuses on European colonialism in Africa and India.Westernisation,’ the actual narrative [now] should
One view of development is that, at the level of thebe one of recovery (Cronon, 1983).
individual, it implies increased skill and capacity, greaterArtificial National Borders:
freedom, creativity, self-discipline, responsibility andBy 1914, frontiers of the African States, which were
material well being (Rodney, 1972), which Europeanto emerge at independence in the 1960s had already
colonial powers achieved through economic growth,been laid down on European maps (Clapham, N.D.).
by exploiting the natural and human resources ofBorders restricted pastoral communities and created
their colonies. Europe and Africa confronted eachconflicts among ethnic groups. By one estimate,
other in respective states of development andbelonging to Asiwaju (1985), no less than 177 African
underdevelopment, the latter term being defined bycultural or ethnic groups are partitioned across
Europeans in relation to the lack of African progressborders, representing on average 43% of their
in the techniques required to sustain an advancedcountry’s population (Englebert, 2001).
materialistic culture (Brett, 1973).In Sudan northern Muslim Arabic speakers had
It can be argued that colonialism had some positiveregarded southern non-Muslims as sources of slaves.
effects. For example, the British instigated irrigationThe creation of Sudan enclosed the two groups,
networks in India: by the 1890s nearly 44,000 milesexacerbating conflicts and causing civil war . In other
of canals and distributaries irrigated a quarter ofcountries there have been conflicts over resources in
India’s total crop area, increasing agriculturalboundary areas. For example, armed clashes
output. But this too had some negative effects,between Burkina and Mali in 1971 and 1985 over the
including waterlogging and salination of the canals andAgacher Strip, which was rumoured to hold oil
greater prevalence of malaria with more mosquito(Englebert, 2001). There are claims over Ethiopian and
breeding areas (Arnold, 1996).Kenyan territory inhabited by ethnic Somalis (Boyd,
Colonialism was also supposedly beneficial because it1979). Thus, colonialism, through the establishment of
provided infrastructure for economic developmentinappropriate borders, created (ongoing) political
and some social services. However, this essay arguesinstability.
that the impacts of colonialism were overwhelminglyCoercive Colonial State Rule:
negative and infrastructure was provided solely toColonial states exploited local people by imposing high
enable the colonial power to exploit the naturaltaxes. The average tax burden in India, for example,
resources and workforce of the colony.was twice that of contemporary England, although
The main ecological impacts of colonialism relate to:average income there was 15 times greater at that
Land and forests: through deforestation and cashpoint in time. The burden of taxation was not
cropping;counterbalanced by expenditure on infrastructure or
Extraction and mining: through changes to thehuman development (Murshed, 2003).
landscape and economic systems;Conclusion
Introduction of animal and human diseases by colonialThe examples from the third world have shown
settlers.interconnectedness between political and ecological
The main political impacts relate to:impacts. For example, Indian colonial railways enabled
Destruction of local institutions;widespread deforestation and increased disease
Coercive and repressive state rule;transmission; for example, the spread of bubonic
Development of artificial national boundaries;plague in the 1890s and influenza in 1918-19 (Arnold,
Displacement of local populations1996). These ecological impacts displaced and killed
The examples will show that the impacts areindigenous peoples and gave the state control over
intertwined. Political ecology assumes that politics andresources, enabling further exploitation to serve a
environment are thoroughly connected (Bryant,political agenda.
1998), and the conclusion will draw together the keyThe legacy of colonialism remains. In India for
points.example, the state organised system of
Ecological impacts‘scientific forestry,’ established under British
Deforestation and Cash Cropping:rule, has remained unchallenged since independence in
British colonialism exploited timber for Britain’s1947, serving the political and economic interests of
industrial revolution. Timber was used for shipbuilding,colonial and postcolonial regimes alike (Bryant, 1997),
to fuel steam engines in industry and transportation,taking resources away from local people.
and to make railroad sleepers for India’s growingThe dependency created by colonialism continues. In
colonial rail network; by 1910 there were more thanthe 1980s neo-liberal structural adjustment
32,000 miles of [rail] track (Arnold and Guha, 1995).programmes pushed ‘free’ trade on third
Forests had to be cleared for the railways, which inworld countries, based on the idea that markets
turn enabled timber exploitation in deeper areas.work best. Trade is unequal. Richer countries subsidise
Cleared areas were converted to agricultural land fortheir own producers and supply chains make
revenue. Ecologically, deforestation resulted in soilsmall-scale producers compete to sell low price
erosion, loss of biodiversity, problems of salination,produce to richer countries, who capitalise on the
rising water tables; abandoned wells; drying or siltationvalue added (Vorley, 2003).
of drainage channels, and the spread of malariaColonialism was a period of monopoly capitalism,
(Gadgil and Guha, 1992).driven by major resource exploitation in the
In the pre-colonial era, under the Mughals, it wasnineteenth and twentieth centuries as colonial powers
non-timber products such as pepper, cardamom andindustrialised. Europe established plantations to grow
ivory that were collected through centralised statecash crops, mines, and transport systems to facilitate
control. Under the British, emphasis shifted tothe extraction of resources; rails and roadways were
‘scientific management’ of timber speciesdesigned for commodity export, and not for
such as teak, pine and deodar (Gadgil and Guha,economic interconnectedness and development within
1992; Bawa 1992). At the same time as imperialcolonies. People were forced by taxes and coercion
foresters sought to eliminate competitor species toto work in colonial enterprises inwhich they were
favoured tree species, they attempted to restrictoverworked and underfed; agriculture suffered, food
alternative forest practices that might ‘interfereproduction declined, and hunger, famines, and disease
with official timber extraction and regenerationfollowed. (Podur, 2002)
operations – shifting cultivation usually being aMany global inequalities can be traced to colonialism. In
favoured target’ (Gadgil and Guha, 1992).addition to unequal trade, the creation of borders and
In Madagascar, French colonialism from 1896 createdstates created conflict between ethnic groups, and
deforestation, pushing coffee cultivation overan unstable third world political system. The scale of
traditional rice harvesting, when it became apparentunsustainable environmental exploitation could not be
that [French] producers were able to generate largecontrolled by newly industrial nations who were in
profits from the latter. This resulted in rice shortages,many cases economically weak. Third world countries
as early as 1911 . The net effect was an increase inhave less capacity to cope with resultant
shifting cultivation as people tried to grow rice toenvironmental problems, but the scale of ecological
feed themselves and coffee as a cash crop. Forestsimpact, stemming from colonial practices and
were increasingly fragmented and either destroyedexploitation, affect the whole of humanity. Ex-colonial
by burning or clear-cutting (Ward, 2002). The statepowers can never abrogate their responsibility for
prohibited shifting cultivation in 1909, imposingwhat the world has become.
“rational forest resource management ", toReferences
reduce deforestation and allocate land for rice, butJournals/Books:
then opened up the island’s forests to loggingAghalino, SO (2000) British Colonial Policies and the Oil
concessions in 1921(1), increasing deforestation andPalm Industry in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria,
illegal felling of trees. A combination of these1900-1960. African Study Monographs, 21 (1) January,
detrimental government policies meant that "roughlyp. 23
70% of the primary forest was destroyed in the 30Arnold, D (1996) The Problem of Nature;
years between 1895 and 1925(1)".Environment, Culture and European Expansion, New
As a result of colonial policies, Madagascar became anPerspectives on the Past. Blackwell Publishers Limited,
importer of food. Local people were displaced andp. 178
the state gained control over resources. CoffeeArnold D and Guha R (1995) Nature, Culture and
plantations were notable for having erosion ratesImperialism: Essays on the Environmental history of
nearly twice as high as subsistence plots. Fertile landSouth Asia. Delhi: Oxford University Press
was cleared and replaced with a persistentBawa, KS (1992) Colonialism, Rural Poverty and the
monoculture, unsuitable for nearly all plant and animalUse of Forest Resources. Conservation Biology,
inhabitants of the previous forest (Ward, 2002).Volume 6, (3), p. 477,488
In Nigeria, the British forced local people to exportBryant, R.L (1997) Beyond the Impasse: The Power
palm oil to Britain, for use as a lubricant for railways,of Political Ecology in Third World Environmental
to make soap, cooking fat and pharmaceuticalResearch. Area 29, 1-15
products. In 1900, palm oil constituted 89% of-(1998) Power, Knowledge and Political Ecology in the
Nigeria’s total export (Aghalino, 2000). TheThird World: A Review. Progress in Physical
subsequent decline of the industry due toGeography 22, 1, p. 79-80, 85
competition from rubber and cocoa and palm oil fromBoyd, JB JR (1979) African Boundary Conflict: An
other colonies, undermined livelihoods.Empirical study. African Studies Review, 22, p. 1-14
Extraction and Mining:Brett EA (1973) Colonialism and Underdevelopment in
Diamond mining in South Africa was lucrative forEast Africa; The Politics of Economic Change
Europe. The colony provided a slave-type labour1919-1939. Heinemann Educational Books Limited.
force to dig out diamonds, while value-added steps,Preface, p. 291
such as cutting and polishing the diamonds, wereChilton, S (2004) POL 3570: Third World and
conducted by a minority of whites in South AfricaDevelopment: what is the Third World available at
and in Europe (Rodney, 1972). Mining was harsh workAccessed 7 February 2005
and separated families, leaving women and childrenClapham, C (N.D.) Boundaries and Indemnities in
unsupported in government reservations.Post-Cold War Africa: Territoriality and Statehood in
Appropriation of the lands of indigenous peoplesTropical Africa, p. 981-983
resulted in massive displacements of people (Frick,Clingingsmith, D and Williamson, JG (2004) Indian
2002). Major ecological impacts included large-scaleDe-industrialisation Under the Mughals and the British,
destruction of lands causing erosion, siltation,p. 3
deforestation, desertification and flattening ofD’Amato, P (2003) The Meaning of Marxism:
mountains. Mining also caused pollution of soils andBringing Back the Old Days of Empire, Socialist
rivers with toxic chemicals used in the industry, asWorker Online, May 16, p. 9
well as air pollution from the dust of bulldozing andDaszak, P., Cunningham, AA., Hyatt AD. (2000)
transportation .Emerging Infectious Diseases of Wildlife –
Diseases (human and animal):Threats to Biodiversity and Human Health. Wildlife
The nineteenth century introduction of steam powerEcology Review. Science Volume 287, 21 January
enabled shipment of live cattle by rail and sea inavailable at
numbers previously impossible (Daszak et al., 2000).Accessed 7 February 05
In Africa, rinderpest, a European livestock disease,Englebert, P., Tarango, S., Carter, M. (2001)
killed off between 90% and 95% of all cattle inDismemberment and Suffocation: A Contribution to
Africa between 1889 and the early 1900s, also killingthe Debate on African Boundaries, p. 3-6
other grazing animals. African tribes dependent onFrick, C (2002) Direct Foreign Investment and the
livestock lost their livelihoods. By one estimate twoEnvironment: African Mining Sector. OECD Global
thirds of the Masaai population in Tanzania died as aForum on International Investment, Conference on
result of rinderpest (Nelson, 2002).Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment,
The absence of grazing animals also resulted inLessons from the Mining Sector, 7-8 February, p.15
growth of grassland vegetation, changing landscapesGadgil, M and Guha, R (1992) This Fissured Land: An
to better suit the tsetse fly. In Uganda, an estimatedEcological History of India. London: Routledge
200,000 people died between 1902 and 1906 fromMurshed, SM (2003) Marginalisation in an Era of
sleeping sickness spread by new hordes of tsetseGlobalisation, July 2nd, p. 4
flies (Nelson, 2002). In South Africa, livestockNelson, RH (2002) Environmental Colonialism:
diseases were accompanied by a lung sickness“Saving” Africa from Africans. Paper
epizootic, which hit in the mid-nineteenth centuryprepared for presentation at the Inter Region
(Ross, 1999). Colonial settlers also brought smallpox,Economic Network Conference, “Conservation
to which Africans had no natural immunity (Nelson,and Sustainable Development” in Nairobi, Kenya
2002). Diseases, both animal and human, caused theand for the World Summit on Sustainable
death and impoverishment of local people.Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, August 25,
Political Impacts2002.
Destruction of Local Institutions:Podur, J (2002) History Handbook Non-Reformist
In many cases, pre-colonial societies had acquiredReparations for Africa: Repairing the Damage available
skills and basic capital, and were developing in theirat Accessed 7 February 2005
own way. India, for example, was a major player inRodney, W (1972) How Europe Underdeveloped
the world export market for textiles, but lost mostAfrica. Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications, Tanzania
of its domestic and export market under BritishPublishing House, p. 9,18,21,162,224
colonialism. Britain raised its protective duty againstVorley, B (2003) Corporate Concentration from
Indian textiles to a massive 85% in 1813, with majorFarmer to Consumer. UK Food Group/IIED.
impact on the Indian market. In 1815, the totalvalueWard, BC (2002) Land Use, Environment, and Social
of Indian cotton goods exported to Britain amountedChange in Madagascar, June 5, p.