Types of Organizational Management Structures

It is typical within an organization, though it willrepresents how many people or business divisions are
depend on its size, to find regional managers (whoat that level relative to the whole. The
manage a geographical region that the organizationhighest-ranking people are at the apex, and there are
operates in), divisional managers (who manage avery few of them. The base may include thousands
particular division within an organization e.g. humanof people who have no subordinates.
resources, finance, sales, etc.), and departmentalThe benefit of a hierarchal structure is also its
managers (who manage the departments within theprimary limitation in that it will reduce the level of
divisions).communication that goes directly to the top. The
The way regions, divisions, departments and peoplehierarchal configuration, however, is the most
link together and interact is set out in a managementprevalent for large corporations, governments, and
structure (sometimes also referred to as aneven organized religions.
organizational structure). The two main types of suchFlat management structures will typically only work
structures are flat and hierarchal.well in smaller companies, or within smaller defined
Organizations that have few or no levels ofunits of a large organization. Once an entity reaches a
management that intervene between the workerscertain size, this type of structure will not work as
and the leaders are employing what is known as awell and could end up having a negative impact on
flat management structure. A flat managementproductivity. Certain financial responsibilities may also
structure promotes the involvement of staff in therequire a more conventional structure, and some
decision-making process by decentralizing saidtheorize that flat organizations become more
process.traditionally hierarchical when they begin to be geared
A flat management structure can help to speed uptowards productivity.
decision-making, as it promotes real-time suggestionsAn organization's complexity can be related to its size
and commentary from the front-line workers, andand how widely distributed it is geographically, and it
eliminates middle-management. This structureis this complexity that governs which management
promotes frequent communications and results in astructure is most beneficial to it. In that respect,
more personal relationship between staff and leadersthere is no straight answer as to which management
of the organization.structure is best overall.
Within a hierarchal management structure eachWhichever management structure is implemented
person is charged with reporting to, or dealing with, aneed to be regularly reviewed to ensure that an
specific manager, who then takes information up (ororganization and all of its subsystems (processes,
down) the chain. In this structure, each body withindepartments, teams, employees, etc.) are working
the organization, except one, is subordinate to aneffectively to achieve the results desired by the
immediate supervisor.organization. Such reviews (referred to as
Such a structure is best visualized as a pyramid,performance management) can be carried out on a
where the height of a person depicts their status,general basis, or on units of performance, such as
power and influence, and the width of that levelquantity, quality, cost or timeliness.